Blog View Page

Guest Blog – Reasons To Buy Latin American Funds

Posted by: Ruairi Dennehy
Tags:
Membership level: Free
As last week’s Bonkers 3-Month Portfolio review highlighted, there has clearly been a recent resurgence in Latin America. Coincidentally, we also came across the below piece from Stewart Investors’ Portfolio Manager Dominic St George, originally produced back in April.
 
It gives a great high level overview of why the region has seen this performance boost in recent months, as well as highlighting the unique attributes the region has moving forwards.
 
Before you dig into the analysis from Stewart Investors below, this was produced initially for professional investors only. As such, there may be elements of the below which may go completely over your head, but don’t worry – you will not be the only one! If you have any questions or would like to understand more about any of the content below, then please don’t hesitate to contact us.
 
With the weighting of Latin American stocks in the Global Emerging Markets benchmark slipping below 10%, down from 25% two decades ago, the region has become something of an investing backwater.1 So why then are we optimistic about the region?
 
If we were to summarise our enthusiasm in one word, it would be this – inflation. 
 
No we aren’t going to argue that developed world central bankers have set us on an inexorable path to hyperinflation with their money printing. Just that after 40 years of declining inflation, the risks are rising of uncomfortable levels of inflation.
 
Because we are all prisoners of recent history, and even the longest investment careers rarely extend to 40 years, what defines ‘uncomfortable’ may not be very high at all, precisely because most portfolios are ill-prepared for an inflationary period.
 
This leads us to Latin America for three reasons.
 
Firstly, if there is one subject on which Latin American executive teams are world-acclaimed in, it is protecting the real value of their shareholders’ funds against inflation. Mexico discontinued inflation-accounting as recently as 2008, while Brazil last saw official inflation above 5% as recently as 2016, when they registered a nearly 9% growth in prices.2 Chile continues to use a separate inflation adjusting currency for denominating property prices and long-term borrowing.
 
For global firms which have not had to worry about rising input costs, the mantra in recent decades has been to make their operations as lean as possible, which has meant outsourcing the ownership of manufacturing assets wherever possible to maximize returns on capital. The consequences of ‘just in time’ and ‘own nothing’ models are clear today – from chronic shortages of protective equipment at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, to component shortages in the auto industry, or the impact of the Suez canal blockage on already high freight costs - all demonstrate the lack of flexibility inherent in these systems. 
 
By contrast, one of our favourite Latin American companies, which sells cardboard, packaging materials and pulp, owns over 500,000 hectares of forested land, over three times the area of Greater London.3 The business school textbooks would no doubt tell management to sell these assets and buy from a third party, which would probably boost returns in accounting terms. However, it is this vertical integration which insulates the company from rising prices.
 
Similarly, a Brazilian company, which is arguably the most successful industrial company in the region, is highly vertically integrated, manufacturing many of the constituent components that go into their extremely wide range of electric motors. Many of these are made at their enormous facility in Brazil, the largest electric motor plant in the world and twice the size of Tesla’s California vehicle plant.3 Again this helps the company keep a tight lid on costs, as well as aiding innovation. 
 
The second reason inflation could be a boon to the region is the dependence of the region’s economies on commodity exports. One of the few asset classes that has historically tended to do well in an inflationary environment is commodities, as happened in the 1970s. While our strategy has limited direct exposure to commodity exporters, this would be a very helpful tailwind for the region.
 
The few areas where Brazil is globally competitive (other than electric motors!) include iron ore, animal rearing (chicken and cattle), soybeans and forestry. The Mexican government derived 40% of its revenues from oil & gas at the peak for oil prices in 2008, a figure that has declined to nearer 10% (partly due to lower production).4 Peru continues to be one of the world’s biggest producers of gold, silver, and copper, while Chile has a large sovereign wealth fund supported by copper sales.5
 
The final reason why Latin America is well placed for a more inflationary environment is the low level of corporate debt. In contrast, in the developed world and in China, persistently low inflation has allowed corporates to borrow historically high amounts at historically low interest rates.
 
Assuming higher inflation is accompanied by higher interest rates, companies will have to spend a higher proportion of their cashflows servicing debt to the detriment of equity holders. The corporate sector in Latin America generally is not highly indebted, and indeed a large number of the companies we hold shares in have net cash balance sheets.
 
To conclude, we are not saying that inflation will rise. Our crystal ball is currently undergoing routine maintenance. We are arguing there are risks of higher-than-expected inflation and that it would be prudent to have some protection against this in a portfolio. We believe our Latin American strategy is positioned to offer this protection, holding high-quality companies with difficult-to-replicate assets, such as brands, intellectual property and lowest-cost manufacturing resources.
 
Dominic St George, Portfolio Manager at Stewart Investors
 
 
 
 
Footnotes
  1. Source: Stewart Investors.
  2. Source: ‘Brazil: Inflation rate from 1985 to 2025’. Statista.
  3. Source: company report.
  4. Source: OECD
  5. Source: ‘Major countries in copper mine production worldwide from 2010 to 2020’. Statista.

Some companies presented in this article are held in the Stewart Investors St Andrews Partners strategies as at March 31, 2021. Reference to the names of each company mentioned in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy, and should not be construed as investment advice or investment recommendation of those companies. Companies mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of Stewart Investors. This stock information does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity nor is it  a recommendation to purchase or sell any security.
 
Certain statements, estimates, and projections in this document may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon Stewart Investors’ current assumptions and beliefs, in light of currently available information, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual actions or results may differ materially from those discussed.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. There is no certainty that current conditions will last, and Stewart Investors undertakes no obligation to correct, revise or update information herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
Disclaimer from Stewart Investors
This document has been prepared for general information purposes only and is intended to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to give advice. The views expressed are the views of the writer at the time of issue and may change over time. This is not an offer document, and does not constitute an offer, invitation, investment recommendation or inducement to distribute or purchase securities, shares, units or other interests or to enter into an investment agreement.
 
No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any matter contained in this document.
 
This document is confidential and must not be copied, reproduced, circulated or transmitted, in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means without our prior written consent. The information contained within this document has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information. We do not accept any liability for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly from any use of this document. References to “we” or “us” are references to Stewart Investors. Stewart Investors is a trading name of First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited, First Sentier Investors International IM Limited and First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited. First Sentier Investors entities referred to in this document are part of First Sentier Investors, a member of MUFG, a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions. MUFG and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. 
 
Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk including loss of income and capital invested.
 
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
 
Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell. Reference to the names of any company is merely to explain the investment strategy and should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any of those companies.
Topic: Investment research


Comments

Would you like to leave a comment?

Register with FundExpert or Log-in

FundExpert on Twitter Twitter

Archive